After a decade in prison, a judge throws out Katherine Seeber's guilty plea in 91-year-old's death

(adapted from the Times Union, June 27, 2011)

By LEIGH HORNBECK

If you have a case with similar issues please contact us to discuss how we can help you or how we might provide support in your case.

BALLSTON SPA -- A woman who pleaded guilty 10 years ago to killing her step-greatgrandmother was given a new chance Monday to take her case to trial.

Saratoga County Judge Jerry Scarano ruled Katherine Seeber's rights were violated, prompting her unfairly to plead guilty.

Seeber, then 19, and Jeffrey Hampshire, then 20, were charged with murder and burglary in the
Feb. 12, 2000, death of 91-year-old Ruth Witter in Stillwater.

After pleading guilty and accepting a sentence of 20 years to life in prison, Seeber testified
against Hampshire. He was acquitted.

Four lawyers who worked pro bono for Seeber persuaded the judge that Garry Veeder, a onetime
forensic scientist, contaminated the case. The filed what is known as a "440 motion" under
Article 440 of the state Criminal Procedure law, made to the trial court, not an appeals court,
about facts not contained in the trial record.

Veeder, who was accused of falsifying data in dozens of criminal cases, committed suicide in May 2008 after he was questioned by State Police.

Veeder had compiled a report used as evidence against Seeber. The report said he detected fibers from gloves Seeber was wearing the day of Witter's death on duct tape found on the woman's mouth when her body was recovered.

"The existence of the forensic report appears to have been the deciding factor in the decision to
plead guilty rather than go to trial," Scarano wrote in his decision.

In addition to the state's evidence against Veeder, at Seeber's hearing in May, a retired forensic
science professor testified for the defense that "It would have been impossible for the conclusion
to have been drawn, as reported by Mr. Veeder, that the fibers from defendant's glove were
'identical' to the fibers on the duct tape."

During Hampshire's trial, Seeber testified she and he switched gloves because his were too big to
use while working with the duct tape she said he put on Witter's mouth. Hampshire's lawyer,
Cheryl Coleman, said Seeber claimed the switch because she knew fibers from her gloves were
on the tape.

Public Defender John Ciulla, Seeber's attorney in 2000 and 2001, said it was this evidence that
led him to advise his client to plead guilty -- even though she insisted she was outside Witter's
home while Hampshire allegedly strangled the elderly woman.

Ciulla said he was "extremely gratified" to hear of the new development. Seeber was young, he
said, her mother lived in Idaho and her father died while the case was under way. Ciulla said he
and Seeber developed a strong bond.

"I relied on Garry Veeder without knowing what was discovered in 2008 by the state Inspector
General," Ciulla said.

Ben Ostrer, one of the four downstate attorneys who took Seeber's case, was waiting on Seeber's
weekly call from the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility Monday afternoon to tell her the news.
Ostrer said he will file an application with the court to have Seeber transferred to county jail.

Scarano's order brought back painful memories for Ruth Witter's surviving son, Alfred Witter,
74, of Malta. He described his late mother as a woman in good health for her age. She didn't
drive, so Alfred Witter picked her up every Friday to go grocery shopping.

"The district attorney didn't try this case properly. (Seeber) shouldn't have been allowed to
plead," said Witter, who expressed uncertainty about what crime Seeber committed. Witter said
he believes Seeber and Hampshire acted together, but Hampshire is the one who killed his
mother. "Physically I'm not sure what role she played, but they did it together," he said.

According to the trial record, Hampshire and Seeber stole jewelry from Witter and the two of
them worked together to hide her body near Saratoga National Historical Park.

District Attorney James Murphy III rejected the premise that Seeber's plea was based on faulty
evidence and said he may appeal Scarano's ruling. If the appeal fails, Seeber will be rearraigned
on the charges first filed against her in 2000, and the road toward a trial will begin again.
If you have a case with similar issues please contact us to discuss how we can help you or how we might provide support in your case. Our lawyers try cases in all courts and provide assistance to members of the bar in matters requiring specialized expertise in examination of expert witnesses in personal injury and criminal matters.
VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS