Judge Bars Crawford Case Tape(adapted from The Times Herald-Record October 18, 2007) By Oliver Mackson New City - A judge yesterday threw a one-two punch that could hurt the corruption case against two officials from the Town of Crawford. Judge Victor J. Alfieri barred prosecutors from using taped conversations, made by a key prosecution witness, as evidence when the two officials go on trial later this month. Alfieri also described that same witness as "incredible," which isn't a compliment. It means that the judge doesn't consider the witness, Crawford businessman Kevin McGill, to be credible when it comes to vouching for the authenticity of the tape. A spokesman for the Orange County District Attorney's Office declined to discuss the judge's ruling. In yesterday's decision, Alfieri said the tape that the grand jury heard is "clearly" not the same tape that prosecutors played during a pretrial hearing last month, when defense lawyers challenged the tape's audibility and McGill testified about how he made the tape. Alfieri, who's a Rockland County Court judge, will discuss the case further with defense lawyers and prosecutors on Monday. He's hearing the case because Orange County's three criminal court judges recused themselves. The tape contains conversations between McGill and Detch. Prosecutors contend that the tape helps to show how Detch acted as a go-between for the other two officials.
The Hudson Valley Law Firm of Ostrer Rosenwasser, LLP, represents clients with personal injury, civil and criminal litigation, matrimonial law issues, in both New York State, and Federal Courts including Chester, Montgomery, Newburgh, Middletown, Kingston, Ellenville, Monticello, Poughkeepsie, Goshen, New City, Wurtsboro, New Platz, Ulster County, Sullivan County, Rockland County, Dutchess County and Orange County, NY. * CV, BV, and AV are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties, Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards, and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell Ratings evaluate two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards. | ||||


